A 160-year-old paradox explains why AI will create more jobs, not fewer, top economist says

Everyone's asking if AI will kill jobs. You're asking a smarter question: will it kill my business if I get it wrong? You've probably already tried something. A tool your team never touched. A consu

Everyone's asking if AI will kill jobs.

You're asking a smarter question: will it kill my business if I get it wrong?

You've probably already tried something. A tool your team never touched. A consultant who handed you a deck and disappeared. A $200/month subscription that's still running on a card you forgot about.

That's not failure. That's what happens when the advice stops at "you need AI" and never gets to "here's specifically what it does for your operation."

A top economist just pointed to a 160-year-old paradox to explain why AI actually creates more demand, not less. The key insight isn't about jobs though. It's about opportunity. When a technology gets cheaper and easier, more people use it to build things. The early movers aren't the ones who bought the most tools. They're the ones who found one real use case that worked.

That's your starting point.

Pick one repetitive task your team does every week that produces a consistent, predictable output. Just one. That's where a focused AI test delivers measurable results inside 30 days without touching anything that already works.

One win builds more confidence than ten demos ever will.

What's the AI tool you bought that nobody on your team actually uses?

#AIStrategy #SmallBusiness #BusinessGrowth #AIImplementation

Original Source

But Slok attributes this to young people starting companies, not to a boom in entry-level associate hiring at law firms or Big Four accounting shops.