IT Brew survey shows heavy GenAI use for code, documentation
PushButton AI Team ·
IT Brew survey shows heavy GenAI use for code, documentation
You bought the AI tool. Nobody used it. $200/month quietly cancelled three months later.
That's not a you problem. That's a targeting problem.
Here's what a recent IT Brew survey quietly confirmed:
You bought the AI tool. Nobody used it. $200/month quietly cancelled three months later.
That's not a you problem. That's a targeting problem.
Here's what a recent IT Brew survey quietly confirmed: the businesses getting real ROI from AI right now aren't using it for everything. They're using it for two specific tasks — writing and documentation. That's it. No exotic implementation. No six-month rollout.
Think about your own team for a second. How many hours a week go into writing proposals, summarizing meetings, drafting SOPs, or updating internal docs? That's probably 5-10 hours of skilled labor weekly. Recoverable with AI in days, not months.
This is the pattern I've seen across 500+ projects. The first win is never the flashy one. It's the boring documentation task nobody wants to do anyway.
One action you can take this week: identify the one document your team rewrites from scratch every single time. A proposal template. A client onboarding checklist. A meeting summary. That's your AI pilot. Start there. Measure time saved in 30 days.
No new systems. No team retraining. Just one boring task done faster.
What's the one document your team wastes the most time rewriting?
