Media giant settles for $930k amid user-snooping allegations - The Register

A media company just settled for $930,000 because their "AI-powered" product was essentially spyware dressed up in marketing language.

Sound familiar? Not the lawsuit — the dressed-up language.

You've probably sat through a demo where someone promised their AI tool would "transform your operations." You bought in. Your team ignored it. $200/month quietly burns while the dashboard sits unopened.

Here's what that settlement actually tells us: the AI hype machine has no shame. Companies slap "AI-powered" on anything because it sells. That's not your fault for being confused. That's by design.

The vendors profit from your uncertainty. The more overwhelming AI feels, the more likely you are to buy something — anything — just to feel like you're keeping up.

This is why "which tool" is the wrong first question. The right question is "which problem costs me the most right now." Start there. One problem. One solution. Measure it in 30 days.

That single win builds more confidence than a $40,000 platform rollout that nobody on your team understands.

Have you ever bought an AI tool that quietly died on the shelf — and what do you wish someone had told you before you signed up?

#AIForBusiness #SmallBusiness #AIStrategy #BusinessOwners

Original Source

... advertising a supposed AI-powered service. This marketing product, called “Active Listening,” was pitched as a novel algorithm that could take ...